Game Theory and the Art of Litigation Settlement

Chris Whitehouse at RPC is one of the most knowledgeable people about litigation risk. In this very interesting series of 4 articles he sets out the fundamentals of calculating litigation risk. In the second article he explains the theory behind our Settle Chart.

Chris Whitehouse at RPC is one of the most knowledgeable people about litigation risk. In this very interesting series of 4 articles he sets out the fundamentals of calculating litigation risk. In the second article he explains the theory behind our Settle Chart. For the time poor, Article 4 contains a brief summary of the first three!

The articles amply demonstrate the fact that you need to understand and model your Opponents’ position to understand where a case might settle. With the right calculations you can often expose the existence of a win/win range for the participants – if it is identified early enough!

Article 1: Graphically mapping the settlement acceptance zone

Article 2: Settlement where the parties disagree on the case merits and ‘what if?’ analysis

Article 3: The impact of part 36 offers on settlement 

Article 4: The optimal level of aggression in settlement negotiations